No replies to this topic

[Cobax]

   I just wanted to start off something a little more basic for myself now. i did not drew this artwork

Attached Files

•  Krunk.jpg   185.21KB   0 downloads

[Cobax]

Wait what you drew the artwork?

No i have not. well i should mention that one. but the card idea of ability i came up with the artwork is not mine

[Cobax]

Don't put your name into the Illustrator's collumn then.

 

The card itself is just meh. Wizards dropped the shadow mechanic some time ago, because it was just not versatile enough to compete with flying or straightforward unblockable. Making a card, to reverse the mistakes in Shadows design is just unnecessary.

It was some slate mistake but i will be careful next time.

 

but i had this idea for shadows for a long time and just wanted to get it out of the way

[Lolilord]

They didn't drop shadow because it was outplayed, they dropped shadow because they realized it's not the kind of thing you can just add in every other set- for example, imagine a few years from now, there is a new ability called {x} and creatures without it can't block it, and they stopped printing flying, therefore, flying would become more powerful, but also more obsolete. So really, evasion tactics like this really just encourage more consuming of magic cards- as if wizards didn't have enough money already.

[Lolilord]

The point was to use flying as an archetype for a general conversation, but yet, flying is most likely to stay BECAUSE of the immense amount of flying that exists, and btw I win many games witihout blocking anything, in fact, shadow rogues+control can make a valid deck, not that I don't see your point there.