5 replies to this topic

[Challenge Deckmaster]

 

Criticism appreciated.

[chaoscal]

The wording on this card is broken basically it's a four drop with pay 4 colorless, the player with the most life wins the game also very out of colour pie since black doesn't untap lands.

[Challenge Deckmaster]

The wording on this card is broken basically it's a four drop with pay 4 colorless, the player with the most life wins the game also very out of colour pie since black doesn't untap lands.

And green doesnt counter spells, and yet, we have green counters.

 

It's meant to be worded this way, it's flavor. He's blind and mad, its irrelevant to him who wins and how.

 

Now if you have actual criticism or advice to alter him while maintaining flavor I'm all ears.

[Gadjiltron]

I'm really not fond of the "Repeat this process if any player chooses to." Trade Secrets is forbidden in EDH due to the collusion it causes. This doesn't seem much different.

 

You can remove the "repeat this process" bit, and in return, lower the cost of that ability to 2 or so.

[chaoscal]

Fair enough. The wording on the first ability needs changing since it's wording allows any player to iterate the ability infinitely. If you want the ability to have people iterate the ability for free say you may only do this once per turn or give the multiple iterations a cost for example, any player may pay 2 during this time to repeat this process

[Challenge Deckmaster]

Fair enough. The wording on the first ability needs changing since it's wording allows any player to iterate the ability infinitely. If you want the ability to have people iterate the ability for free say you may only do this once per turn or give the multiple iterations a cost for example, any player may pay 2 during this time to repeat this process

I like that last idea. Will implement.